1996-01-31 - Re: Lotus Notes

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Message Hash: fda053e934e06350d5c84ebf7a022b447d3428d06246cabc7053fa80b6c0afaf
Message ID: <9601310019.AA18345@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 15:31:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:31:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:31:06 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
Message-ID: <9601310019.AA18345@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>I find this very interesting. RSA prohibits its licencees from using RSA
>software with truly secure keylenghts.

Hunh?  I could find no mention of keylength or keysize in the RSAREF
documents I had around.  I'm at home now, but I also recall no mention
of keysize or keylength in the license OSF has, either.
	/r$

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to ““Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>”
• Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”

• Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”

• 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:31:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
  • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:38:27 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - “Brian A. LaMacchia” <bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
    • 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:36:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)