1995-12-14 - Re: PGP Interoperability?
Header Data
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 39eb47b64e311fac1367a0fe2d0d7ef5496b1b7895b86153dffbac59cbc2ff69
Message ID: <199512141052.FAA19291@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9512141007.AA00520@commtouch.co.il>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-14 11:37:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:37:32 +0800
Raw message
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:37:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: PGP Interoperability?
In-Reply-To: <9512141007.AA00520@commtouch.co.il>
Message-ID: <199512141052.FAA19291@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
You should ask these questions somewhere like alt.security.pgp, if anywhere.
I'll give a two bit answer ;)
Geoff Klein writes:
> Is it legal for a US citizen to encrypt or check signatures with a 2.6ui
> public key ?
Yes.
> Would sending a public key out of the US be reagarded as export by ITAR?
No (that is, the ITAR place no restrictions on such actions).
-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
Thread
Return to December 1995
- Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
Return to “marina kats <marina@commtouch.co.il>”
- 1995-12-14 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:10:13 +0800) - PGP Interoperability? - marina kats <marina@commtouch.co.il>
- 1995-12-14 (Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:37:32 +0800) - Re: PGP Interoperability? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)