From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:58:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
In-Reply-To: <acb027040402100417fa@[137.110.24.250]>
Message-ID: <199510232248.SAA26502@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Lance Cottrell writes:
> If all nym servers were standardized to run from the same account name
> (nymserve for example) the remailers could be configured to only deliver
> final hops to addresses with that username.

A detail I missed before: the remailers used in pseudonym reply blocks must
somehow deliver replies to the True Name (verinymous ?) address of the holder
of the pseudonym. I suppose they could all finally be routed to the 
pseudonymizer, which would deliver the messages directly to the intended 
recipient (holder of the pseudonym). 

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>