1995-09-22 - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>
Message Hash: fa8cd18fe236960679c0651d3d0fca963e46b1b5796301fa9bf5afa2d0b5c4cd
Message ID: <199509220519.BAA02311@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <306216B6@hamachi>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-22 05:19:47 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 22:19:47 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 22:19:47 PDT
To: David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>
Subject: Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
In-Reply-To: <306216B6@hamachi>
Message-ID: <199509220519.BAA02311@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



David Van Wie writes:
> > Does this mean that prior art would no longer invalidate a patent?
> 
> No.  It just moves the prior art date from the date of invention to the date 
> of filing the patent application.

Can you explain that? It doesn't make much sense...

.pm

Thread

• Return to September 1995

• Return to “David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>”
• Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 18:53:54 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - David Van Wie <dvw@hamachi.epr.com>
  • 1995-09-22 (Thu, 21 Sep 95 22:19:47 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 01:27:11 PDT) - Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)