1996-01-09 - Re: [NOISE] The LOGIC of Navigator 2.0 ?

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: ca06dc915945c1203253677bbd3b829dd06bfa5d4f698ab549e66fb9f69bf185
Message ID: <199601091756.MAA31007@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.960109014646.1237C-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-09 18:14:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:14:50 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:14:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: [NOISE] The LOGIC of Navigator 2.0 ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.960109014646.1237C-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
Message-ID: <199601091756.MAA31007@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

James M. Cobb writes:
>   That message quoted a couple of paragraphs from a Bloomberg news 
>   agency newsstory.  The story is headlined, Netscape Will Release 
>   an Updated Internet Browser in Two Weeks.  The story's datelined 
>   Mountain View CA. 
[...]
>   You posted your message via Best Internet Communications Inc in 
>   Mountain View CA... 
>  
>   Whatever the significance of that may be, 

As Perry has patiently pointed out time and again, this is not 
"conspiracypunks". In this case, I expect you might even get laughed off
alt.conspiracy. Don't post this silliness here.

Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMPKsJCnaAKQPVHDZAQGRkQf/afMIAN7jcBZFb7mN2OH/d8FtzX7qWvIx
0hYiWw6pK3d8S/4hDzPNrr5ORyNmW7xWfZ0VrU3Oqryvj6dvRVGbCk99dO+8jTQd
qiJohvOm9OiYBLG4raoqWTnF0eBw3COnKs1qS4Jk9rr1SfFYJYAtBXYMH9NjcgwU
qocrhXPdvltcF2piQqZwzWvKvR7IZmp6jF1UzbuL5HDabtr3qi3B2qjAJuf22/UM
866RQGUrBUNOTSoDbTOWJ4eP8GKseqFIEEJGBA44rhwGm8VOwrZIPNqCdUgi8Qaj
rSrPkJbXKGg/2N0WkuQHIjR+bJhdkmHcN2ksqNU0qTdYUPWszEIpZQ==
=Gl7W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread