From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Message Hash: f8201c97d934ac4887e07cebe363282aa9cf179cc1ab6cb00bb1eae428766c2d
Message ID: <199511022239.RAA06803@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9511021924.AA12407@alpha>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-06 00:06:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 08:06:51 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 08:06:51 +0800
To: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system
In-Reply-To: <9511021924.AA12407@alpha>
Message-ID: <199511022239.RAA06803@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike McNally writes:
>
> hallam@w3.org writes:
> > It is a fair point that just because technology has changed the
> > nature of the game it should not mean that wiretaps cease to be
> > possible.
>
> I disagree that this is a "fair point". That wiretaps are possible is
> an accident of design. Just because that slice of the salami appears
> gone, I see no reason to concede that it can't be re-attached.
Indeed, I have searched both the constitution and my collected works
of Nietzsche and found no reference to the inalienable right of
governments to listen in on any conversations, let alone the 1% of
conversations the FBI wants access to. By the way, I believe the
quantity in question exceeds the quantity tapped by the East German
government at its height -- certainly it does if you take into account
the fact that phones were more scarce there.
Thank you, Louis Freeh, for taking another step towards the police state.
Perry
Return to November 1995
Return to “Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>”