1995-12-03 - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position

Header Data

From: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
To: jsw@netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Message Hash: 3e159ab13507a8f66439f2eee4ecf62c047d01a916e0c43498a0bb8ce4e3b56c
Message ID: <199512030009.SAA00717@proust.suba.com>
Reply To: <30C0E317.71DC@netscape.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-03 00:09:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Dec 95 16:09:49 PST

Raw message

From: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 95 16:09:49 PST
To: jsw@netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Subject: Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
In-Reply-To: <30C0E317.71DC@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <199512030009.SAA00717@proust.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


>   Many customers in other countries want our US version.  They are pushing
> on their governments and the US government to get it.  This is already
> happening.

Couldn't you set up a company in the Netherlands or some such place that 
allowed you to export to the rest of the world?

There could be a US version of Netscape, produced here in the States, and
a strong international version produced by a different company, using non
crypto technology licensed from Netscape and a crypto engine produced
entirely offshore.  You could make the offshore firm virtually worthless
by forcing them to give all the money to Netscape proper in the form of
licensing fees.  It wouldn't matter who owned it, so you could give the
franchise to a Dutch national without giving away the store.

I seem to remember US companies getting around restrictions on doing
business with South Africa using a similar strategy. 





Thread