1995-09-17 - Re: “Attachments”

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 57b2d5476f58ede6ff06bb44eae6ac657c90ed19f679d6ed126a49439c31badf
Message ID: <9509172245.AA20150@cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <ac81e3df200210046fa3@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-17 22:46:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:46:06 PDT

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:46:06 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: "Attachments"
In-Reply-To: <ac81e3df200210046fa3@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <9509172245.AA20150@cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May the Luddite ;) writes:
[in response to Michael Shields' application/pgp message]
> Why do people keep sending "attachments"?
> 
> This was just a text article, and not an application (program), so why was
> it included as an "attachment"?

It's useful for those of us with MIME-enabled mailers, appropriately
configured -- PGP is automatically launched to check the signature.

It's not useful for others on the list, AFAIK.

Pretty please, let's not have another MIME war; I think we drove Amanda
Walker away permanently with the last one.

Followups directed somewhere other than cypherpunks@toad.com.

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>




Thread