From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 95 02:30:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
In-Reply-To: <199510190848.BAA13416@orac.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <199510190930.FAA00549@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tom Weinstein writes:
> A simple addition to the remailer protocol would be
> to encrypt the message and the control information seperately.  This
> would allow the sender of a message to provide a pre-packaged method for
> returning a reply.  The recipient of the original message could then
> just blindly send his reply to the starting point remailer specified in
> the original message by tacking the pre-packaged routing information on
> to the front of his message.

Congratulations, you have reinvented what we usually call "reply blocks". 
See the archives and some remailer help files & web pages.

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>