cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-12-10 - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?

Header Data

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Black Unicorn <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ee1f112a7b3a84738187f148a5602532e64e01ec50b2ed42a059ac3d17e75d11
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210022636.18670F-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210012418.18670C-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-10 07:29:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:29:07 PST

Raw message

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:29:07 PST
To: Black Unicorn <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210012418.18670C-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210022636.18670F-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Brian Davis wrote:
> 
> Bob's Fourth Amendment rights are not triggered by his contract with 
        ^^^^^^
Ack.  Meant "Fifth." (Although Bob's Fourth Amendment rights are 
not triggered either.)

> Alice.  Alice can be compelled to give up the key (by testimony or 
> production) and giving up that key does not tend to incriminate *Alice* 
> in a violation of law.  Alice can't invoke Bob's rights against 
> self-incrimination for obvious reasons:  Alice isn't Bob.
> ^^^^
> EBD
>

Thread