1995-09-04 - Re: Joel’s RSA-t’s
Header Data
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 7848ef84d01719c086471c37bb7025a56fa20301683cf9a7a481486d71826515
Message ID: <9509040035.AA28573@cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <m0snW0o-0001puC@wittsend.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-04 00:35:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 17:35:43 PDT
Raw message
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 17:35:43 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Joel's RSA-t's
In-Reply-To: <m0snW0o-0001puC@wittsend.com>
Message-ID: <9509040035.AA28573@cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike writes [re: Perl-RSA T-shirts]:
> I just have one problem though... If these things are classified
> as a "munition" aka a "weapon" by da fed's how does that affect us down
> here in good old Georgia where our legislature has passed a law making
> it a crime to be in posession of a weapon anywhere within a hundred yards
> or so of school property.
Strong crypto is considered to be a munition *for purposes of U.S. export
controls*. With respect to possession within the U.S., there aren't any
laws stopping you from waving strong cryptography around wherever you like
(at least, not yet).
-Futplex
Thread
- Return to August 1995
Return to September 1995
- Return to “A.Back@exeter.ac.uk”
- Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
- Return to “Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>”
Return to “WOOD@VAX2.ROCKHURST.EDU”
- 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 10:20:21 PDT) - Joel’s RSA-t’s - WOOD@VAX2.ROCKHURST.EDU
- 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:33:19 PDT) - Joel’s RSA-t’s - A.Back@exeter.ac.uk
- 1995-08-29 (Tue, 29 Aug 95 12:50:15 PDT) - Re: Joel’s RSA-t’s - Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>
- 1995-09-04 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 17:35:43 PDT) - Re: Joel’s RSA-t’s - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)