1996-01-26 - Re: Microsoft’s CryptoAPI - thoughts?

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 3769fbf55c1bcc827ceb0d23c798d8f24c13f43296339908c950684f4ba7fbc6
Message ID: <199601260802.DAA08993@thor.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <v01520d0200111847fc42@[153.37.173.54]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-26 09:26:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:33 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Microsoft's CryptoAPI - thoughts?
In-Reply-To: <v01520d0200111847fc42@[153.37.173.54]>
Message-ID: <199601260802.DAA08993@thor.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

rickt@psa.pencom.com writes:
> [Info can be found at: http://www.microsoft.com/intdev/inttech/cryptapi.htm]

Has someone here managed to extract PostScript hardcopy of the CAPI from this
Web page? I tried earlier this evening and wound up with a miniature 
ecological disaster on my hands. The page says:

"For ease of online reading and printing, we've provided copies of this
lengthy document in Microsoft Word and Postscript formats."

I grabbed the ZIPped PostScript version and unZIPped it, which resulted in a
single file called "capiapp.ps". Making the wild assumption that this was
indeed a PostScript file, I sent it to the printer and forgot about it for a
while. 

An hour later I discovered a chaotic scene in the printer room, as the
printer had spewed about 1.5 reams of raw PostScript printouts. The output bin
had overflowed for a while, spraying paper in several directions. <heavy sigh>

As it turns out, the file unhelpfully begins with 
	%-12345X@JPL ENTER LANGUAGE=POSTSCRIPT
preceding the usual "%!PS-Adobe-3.0" line. Worse still, it appears that the
capiapp.ps file is actually a catenation of many PostScript files (one per
chapter?), each beginning with a version of this ensnarling line.

I could do some global search-and-replacing, etc., but I think I'll wait for
Microsoft to distribute a decent PS version of this document. Perhaps they
should consider not generating it with MS Word....

Grr! 

Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMQiKcynaAKQPVHDZAQEwQAf/SLkD9a4vP7Vl5md0WzPCE+v0fX83W0Hw
wj0OJLs7gRcyLJx0eLcBxR7G86CGRwRRLat+QbhEPqaiNipQTG0W5EgF+i/6DlCk
y7c8adATFrPCGOjNS49nnPWtpBEUo+q9ZLHYzYkPHnt8k+8q7EZnET/wO9GV8VJg
ZsjjQeslR2/r9KnzyXaFsuQpPI0Vgl7/ilTE03bPWoiHrzQvQTGIABQr5seRORWb
3RDLee1KOfXBPfpzlPNt/K6bcPFu2sRLLMCUAtImm5hSHCjdelkD+3sZAlaJpHwH
Se9osUfNlMM3ohFZydOezjlWsGzIZgLPxMouQgvX2MDcJTwQSe7ZyA==
=XHjr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread