From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: e6c959530574e89bd83553434fa875117e895a36a5453eaa2dbd28350625f911
Message ID: <9508031243.AA18140@cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9507210900.AA25179@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-03 12:43:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Aug 95 05:43:42 PDT
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 95 05:43:42 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Transport Layer Security (Was: Re: "Cypherpunks Write Code" as a Putdown)
In-Reply-To: <9507210900.AA25179@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9508031243.AA18140@cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Perry writes:
> I believe that between IPSP for the
> links and MOSS (and SHTTP using MOSS for document security) we should
> have the whole thing wrapped up in a couple of years. Problems still
> to solve include security for the internet's routing protocols,
> protection against denial of service attacks, etc.
Could someone say a bit more about the perceived difficulties associated
with secure network routing protocols ? TIA.
I am not at all optimistic about defeating DoS attacks....
[...]
> Those people who would rather work than talk are invited to start
> reading the internet drafts (some of which are soon to be RFCs) and
> help out with the effort. I suspect that a big push from about 25
> people could manage to implment just about everything we want and then
> we could go on and live the rest of our lives.
>
> There is a lot of real hard work to do in the next year or two and I
> invite members of the community to quit waiting for the CryptoRapture
> in which the X-Ists bring down the cypher systems of the future, and
> help us actually do the job so that we'll see this stuff in our
> lifetime.
(just felt this was worth quoting)
-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
Return to August 1995
Return to “tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)”