1995-08-10 - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)

Header Data

From: solman@MIT.EDU
To: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Message Hash: ee67cd912f79b29d1c6a572060f78ade9a83707174bc7a2eaa0ac439750a7e77
Message ID: <9508100105.AA11391@ua.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <199508100000.UAA07792@crypto.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-10 01:05:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:05:40 PDT

Raw message

From: solman@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:05:40 PDT
To: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Subject: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
In-Reply-To: <199508100000.UAA07792@crypto.com>
Message-ID: <9508100105.AA11391@ua.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On a fair number of occassions I have been told that federal type folks
have made statements to the effect that there is no such thing as a "TOP
SECRET" classification of US government docs. Since really secret things
tend to get neither confirmed nor denied, I am inclined to believe this.
Thus SECRET is the top classification in today's government/military. If
anybody knows otherwise I would be interested in the information.

JWS

Thread

• Return to August 1995

• Return to “futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)”
• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
• Return to “Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>”
• Return to ““Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>”
• Return to “Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>”

• Return to “solman@MIT.EDU”

• 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:00:53 PDT) - “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 16:51:42 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:05:40 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - solman@MIT.EDU
      • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 18:08:53 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 23:19:09 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
      • 1995-08-10 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 01:45:34 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
  • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 17:59:48 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - “Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>