1995-10-11 - Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 2fc7e9f34ad539c5785835a86941c99556afc6ded67e63be8b89244e37251f73
Message ID: <199510112251.SAA32456@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-11 22:51:43 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:51:43 PDT

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:51:43 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: CancelMoose = William Nagengast?
Message-ID: <199510112251.SAA32456@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mark writes:
> #define paranoia on
> 
> Just ask your local TLA that has traffic monitors on the up and down links of
> all the remailers so they can track a piece of email from sender to recipient.
> They will take the (relatively small) logs of the hour and pump out a name
> for you.
> 
> #define paranoia off
> 
> :)

That's one of the principal advantages of Mixmaster over the earlier 
generation anonymous remailers. Approaching a Chaumian digital mix more
closely than previous implementations, it uses only encrypted standard-sized
packets in transit. This protocol should make it hard or impossible to 
narrow the list down to anything like a single name, depending on ambient
traffic conditions.

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
"Our encryption doesn't use an encryption algorithm" -Elementrix




Thread