1995-10-23 - Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 59d11d845533744c1963291a3f1bc6b0b0fbf31052ed22434ff2e878f0ce8957
Message ID: <199510231915.PAA17647@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9510231413.AA26514@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-23 19:13:18 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 12:13:18 PDT

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 12:13:18 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF
In-Reply-To: <9510231413.AA26514@all.net>
Message-ID: <199510231915.PAA17647@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dr. Frederick B. Cohen writes:
> If Netscape wants to claim their product doesn't degrade security, they
> should provide a safe postscript interpreter or not provide hooks to
> unsafe ones.

By the same logic, it might be claimed: "If Netscape wants to claim their
product doesn't degrade security, they should provide a safe Internet or not
provide access to unsafe Internet sites."

I disagree. And yes, I'm arguing in my spare time.

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>




Thread