From: solman@MIT.EDU
To: Jim_Miller@suite.com
Message Hash: 8a2580a339d2ddbc76814b264ab6d1f2ab15c62ca36e1b506695d82cbb376865
Message ID: <9408040206.AA01377@ua.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <9408032324.AA03913@bilbo.suite.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-04 02:07:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 19:07:27 PDT
From: solman@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 19:07:27 PDT
To: Jim_Miller@suite.com
Subject: Re: anonymous anonymous remailers?
In-Reply-To: <9408032324.AA03913@bilbo.suite.com>
Message-ID: <9408040206.AA01377@ua.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Here's an interesting idea...
>
> Assume we create the alt.anonremailer.net newsgroup mechanism that
> Jonathan Rochkind recently suggested (and it worked).
>
> Could we then not use the newsgroup, in combination with a net of
> well-known remailers, to give us the capability to have some remailers at
> unknown locations by having some remailers post encrypted reply blocks as
> their "addresses"?
This is just painfully non-scalable. Sure it will
work for now, but its not something that will last
once large numbers of people begin using it.
JWS
Return to August 1994
Return to “solman@MIT.EDU”