1994-07-18 - Re: pseudonyms and such

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
Message Hash: 71668afd1fa84c45f9baceb167d477cb6e9f3abcf9bf96a7dbd5480fbb893082
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9407181252.A26243-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199407181813.OAA19246@cs.oberlin.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-18 19:51:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 12:51:15 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 12:51:15 PDT
To: Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
Subject: Re: pseudonyms and such
In-Reply-To: <199407181813.OAA19246@cs.oberlin.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9407181252.A26243-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

On Mon, 18 Jul 1994, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

> I think it's rather odd to find cypherpunks basically flaming someone 
> because they choose to use a pseudonym instead of their real name. 
> Or presuming guilt of being Detweiler because of the choice to use the
> pseudonym.
> . . . 
> I think it's awfully hypocritical to judge this pseudonomous person
> harshly merely because of her pseudonimity, or because that 
> pseudonimity makes you suspect she's really detweiler. 

It looks as though Jonathan is assuming facts not in evidence.  I don't 
recall ANY posts that judged "this pseudonomous person harshly merely 
because of her [sic] pseudonimity," or otherwise (emphasis added).
^^^^^^^
I think it would behoove us to eschew knee-jerk reactions in favor of 
careful reading and critical thinking.


 S a n d y








Thread