From: joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>
To: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu
Message Hash: b2434a8d616a1107573b7d2ad78ef8ba4ab05507e43c7a54bd446a90662e8d2e
Message ID: <199407181835.LAA03330@sleepy.retix.com>
Reply To: <199407181813.OAA19246@cs.oberlin.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-18 18:35:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 11:35:00 PDT
From: joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 11:35:00 PDT
To: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu
Subject: Re: pseudonyms and such
In-Reply-To: <199407181813.OAA19246@cs.oberlin.edu>
Message-ID: <199407181835.LAA03330@sleepy.retix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I think it's rather odd to find cypherpunks basically flaming someone
> because they choose to use a pseudonym instead of their real name.
> Or presuming guilt of being Detweiler because of the choice to use the
> pseudonym. Isn't the right to hide one's official on-your-passport
> identity something that we all supposedly support? Seems kind of contrary
> to this goal to go making anyone who exercises this right feel unwelcome
> on the list.
finger is generally enabled at netcom. interestingly, fingering nym@netcom
causes a segmentation fault. .plan a link to something wierd maybe?
> I think it's awfully hypocritical to judge this pseudonomous person
> harshly merely because of her pseudonimity, or because that
> pseudonimity makes you suspect she's really detweiler.
well, she seems to be an idiot which is usually enough for me.
josh
Return to July 1994
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”