From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)
Message Hash: 912cfefcfe9d51b51b4db93eb5db462239d539f0c5a338e95cf9ffd8528dd58e
Message ID: <199407111649.JAA12304@netcom13.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199407111621.MAA14136@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-11 16:48:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 11 Jul 94 09:48:52 PDT
From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 94 09:48:52 PDT
To: mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)
Subject: Re: Supposed NSA turncoat reveals monitoring of anon remailers? >pshah!<
In-Reply-To: <199407111621.MAA14136@eff.org>
Message-ID: <199407111649.JAA12304@netcom13.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org> writes:
> I believe this to be a forgery of course, but it might be
> of interest anyway.
>> I am a pro-privacy political sabatour within the NSA. I am
>> warning all new users of anonymous mailers about NSA traffic
>> watching. We listen to all messages passing through certain
>> intermediate nodes and compare them with messsages leaving
>> anonymous services. We are able to trace 70% of all
>> messages.
This doesn't seem too unreasonable even if the writer only
imagines he is working for the NSA. The Anonymous Posting
Service at Penet is vulnerable to a number of tricks which might
be used to disclose the identity of posters. I have always
regarded it as a handy tool for people wishing to maintain a
small degree of privacy while posting on sensitive or
embarrassing topics. I certainly wouldn't use it to threaten the
President or trade plutonium futures.
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Return to August 1994
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>”