From: Eric_Weaver@avtc.sel.sony.com (Eric Weaver)
To: blancw@microsoft.com
Message Hash: 9dc4eb68429b8947a48513ec8679b2332a7b255b8a26bcaf4e93f4b947d3ff6a
Message ID: <9407292036.AA07392@sosfc.avtc.sel.sony.com>
Reply To: <9407291941.AA26399@netmail2.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-29 20:36:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 13:36:54 PDT
From: Eric_Weaver@avtc.sel.sony.com (Eric Weaver)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 13:36:54 PDT
To: blancw@microsoft.com
Subject: FW: No SKE in Daytona and other goodies
In-Reply-To: <9407291941.AA26399@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <9407292036.AA07392@sosfc.avtc.sel.sony.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 12:34:14 PDT
From: Timothy C. May
But what is the reason of the involvement of "law enforcement" and the
"intelligence community" in this matter? I refer you all to the
upcoming conference agenda, the involvement of NIST/NSA, TIS, Denning,
and FBI Director Louis Freeh. Look at the papers being presented at
the conference.
Any questions?
.............................................
If a system contains "protocols especially suited for eventual
mandatory use", like SKE, does this of necessity mean that the
developers intended that it should become part of a nationally-mandated
open avenue to spying on anyone who uses it?
Not of necessity. (One senses some bottom-covering here...)
It DOES of necessity mean that they are, wittingly or unwittingly,
contributing to opening the avenue. It is incumbent upon us to make
them aware of that contribution, so that their consciences may be
tortured thereby.
If in fact they have any.
Return to July 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”