From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
To: blancw@microsoft.com (Blanc Weber)
Message Hash: ab361a1ab9747fa006415471bb1e6e9822c6fe1d6452d7125fa11076c3a134e1
Message ID: <199407292032.AA11586@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Reply To: <9407291941.AA26399@netmail2.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-29 20:34:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 13:34:52 PDT
From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 13:34:52 PDT
To: blancw@microsoft.com (Blanc Weber)
Subject: Re: FW: No SKE in Daytona and other goodies
In-Reply-To: <9407291941.AA26399@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <199407292032.AA11586@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> If a system contains "protocols especially suited for eventual
> mandatory use", like SKE, does this of necessity mean that the
> developers intended that it should become part of a nationally-mandated
> open avenue to spying on anyone who uses it?
No, but (Cliche Alert) the road to key escrow is paved with good
intentions. IMHO the developers who might actually be working on
implementations of this scheme either
a) don't know that it _could easily_ "become part of
a nationally-mandated open avenue to spying,"
b) know but don't think such developments are likely, or
c) know and don't care.
Clearly education is a powerful antidote to cases a) and b)
- -Paul
- --
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | "Information is the currency of democracy."
perobich@ingr.com | - some old guy named Thomas Jefferson
Of course I don't speak for Intergraph.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAgUBLjlnc6fb4pLe9tolAQEL5gP/VNTciCCZNEQm5o99ynHYmXJFnOYt3QuP
30do0DZMxIyjYh6PwiyXbpIn2odqqGqy1pt1b+12+s24bEAcRI2tm86bZH5ebwU2
7nZvu8MedmMHp8PNy9ihlXWtUwDDTK1TPK4DmBOZPcvHN5F8sdQcqq6lSqELIBcA
NrM2P47zMGw=
=8yyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”