From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: a6f80b7b32921278026fc37619f70db08a8795e5921354591df6902263923e6f
Message ID: <199407281918.AA04080@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Reply To: <199407281723.KAA10659@netcom13.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 19:22:40 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:22:40 PDT
From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:22:40 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
In-Reply-To: <199407281723.KAA10659@netcom13.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199407281918.AA04080@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Back in 1986-7 there was a major effort to have DES replaced with a
> new encryption standard. I don't recall the name for the program, but
> it had the support of several chip companies (Intel, AMD, etc.) and
> was, I seem to recall, mentioned prominently in the National Computer
> Security Act of 1987.
I think Tim's thinking of the Commercial Comsec Endorsement Program (CCEP),
an effort to get NSA-approved crypto hardware out into the commercial
world. For some reason it never really caught on :)
- -Paul
- --
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | "Information is the currency of democracy."
perobich@ingr.com | - some old guy named Thomas Jefferson
Of course I don't speak for Intergraph.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAgUBLjgEaafb4pLe9tolAQFWkwQAqmH/yf20V6w8gyLW1B18XDA+9ZakEHEt
GxUmze9xhjm/NZuPalCvHcj+QEf8OHUpnZD4I9BfGj47fskj1yM20dH7xUuzqLy+
SJJsISvOoM5dd3SxbetblZYHwcG9pnAt9kS73InS2osiPNNiWnt0SoByH9E32+Gg
xMXwsylpAaw=
=Fa/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”