1994-07-01 - Re: Detweiler clone at WS

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Message Hash: bd81c37db721a01a830c937f3fd95558c6b5c4d13c7ed4809a270e710053d3db
Message ID: <199407010937.AA24172@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 09:37:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 02:37:37 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 02:37:37 PDT
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Subject: Re: Detweiler clone at WS
Message-ID: <199407010937.AA24172@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

R.>The down side was that licensing was mentioned as the first recourse
R.>from the state.  When we complained of the financial hit, the talk
R.>turned to registration.  But the sense was clearly toward proactive
R.>state control.

Are these people mentally retarded or what.  A BBS is a publication.  The 
1st Amendment was specifically written to outlaw the British licensing of 
publications.  No risk.


--- WinQwk 2.0b#1165