1994-07-09 - DC nets.

Header Data

From: Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
To: N/A
Message Hash: e6da66d23eec55ac393639b4bc41ce7e84c4470e88e9f823b1ca8b3b7123efcb
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9407090843.A6975-0100000@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
Reply To: <199407090519.WAA22555@netcom12.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-09 14:34:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 07:34:22 PDT

Raw message

From: Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 07:34:22 PDT
Subject: DC nets.
In-Reply-To: <199407090519.WAA22555@netcom12.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9407090843.A6975-0100000@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



One problem I see with DC nets is that the government *WILL* hold all 
people involved guilty of conspiricy, then make them prove they are 
inocent.  It would be sufficient, however, to have everyone provide this 
proof of inocence, based upon the sort of thing being discussed in 
sci.crypt under hiding ciphertext in ciphertext.

Roger.

Thread

• Return to July 1994

• Return to “Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>”
• Return to “koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )”
• Return to “pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”
• Return to “Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>”

• Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”

• 1994-07-09 (Fri, 8 Jul 94 21:37:41 PDT) - NII, NSA and Computer Security Act of 1987 - koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
  • 1994-07-09 (Fri, 8 Jul 94 22:25:26 PDT) - Re: NII, NSA and Computer Security Act of 1987 - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1994-07-09 (Sat, 9 Jul 94 07:34:22 PDT) - DC nets. - Roger Bryner <bryner@atlas.chem.utah.edu>
    • 1994-07-11 (Mon, 11 Jul 94 06:27:53 PDT) - NII, NSA and Computer Security Act of 1987 - pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
  • 1994-07-11 (Mon, 11 Jul 94 06:38:38 PDT) - Re: NII, NSA and Computer Security Act of 1987 - Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>