From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 187b310dc1555edb8705e6f3b406b3f042dc462d7708ec73983775f9d1c8cdbd
Message ID: <199408242201.PAA05831@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-24 22:01:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 15:01:04 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 15:01:04 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous questionnaires
Message-ID: <199408242201.PAA05831@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
You wrote to my question regarding anonymous questionnaires:
>I don't know if the researchers are willing to change their methodology just
>for you, but it's easy to meet all the requirements you listed: Put your
>questionnaire answers in a blank envelope and seal it. Enclose the blank
>envelope in another envelope. The outer envelope has your name and various
>other information, i.e., everything needed to create the audit trail. When
>it arrives, the researchers (whom you must trust) open the outer envelope,
>remove the blank inner envelope, and toss it irretrievably into a pile with
>all the other blank inner envelopes. There would be no record of which
>questionnaire went with which respondent, but there would be a clear record
>of who's responded and who hasn't.
This system would not provide
> 1. Correlate my answers to the answers of my partner.
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> PGP public key by finger
Return to August 1994
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”