1994-08-09 - Re: broadcast encryption

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Message Hash: 5e9dcd86aecd5faa3714c8e5b7d72e4694ad4fb70f2ccbff2fdfa8bca604fb2b
Message ID: <9408091634.AA23392@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9408091556.AA22438@ah.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-09 16:34:26 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:34:26 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:34:26 PDT
To: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Subject: Re: broadcast encryption
In-Reply-To: <9408091556.AA22438@ah.com>
Message-ID: <9408091634.AA23392@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Eric Hughes says:
>    What I would like to see is low-level digital signatures on the
>    level of IP or AX.25.  IP is doable, I would think.  
> 
> What is the policy purpose for signing packets?  It will affect the
> design.

Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
standardization work...

Perry

Thread

• Return to August 1994

• Return to “Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>”
• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to “snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)”

• 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 08:00:59 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
  • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:24:58 PDT) - broadcast encryption - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
    • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 09:34:26 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:17:56 PDT) - broadcast encryption - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
        • 1994-08-09 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:24:16 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1994-08-10 (Tue, 9 Aug 94 18:03:31 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>