1994-08-10 - Re: broadcast encryption

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
Message Hash: 69c36c648555356381d968e07924d7fdf57a8b41b7de312c928c1778435a8a8f
Message ID: <9408101344.AA26604@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <aa6e59b01c0210230ca8@DialupEudora>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-10 13:45:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:45:06 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:45:06 PDT
To: snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
Subject: Re: broadcast encryption
In-Reply-To: <aa6e59b01c0210230ca8@DialupEudora>
Message-ID: <9408101344.AA26604@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Bob Snyder says:
> >Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
> >standardization work...
> 
> Is this the IPng work I just saw a bunch of RFC notices go out for, or
> something different?  Any drafts you can point me to?

I posted a summary to this very mailing list only a few days ago.

.pm

Thread

• Return to August 1994

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to “snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)”

• 1994-08-10 (Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:42:42 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
  • 1994-08-10 (Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:45:06 PDT) - Re: broadcast encryption - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>