1994-08-29 - Statistics on remail message sizes
Header Data
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a24f58db8c1b61e9f428ae0b8552f0f769348420c617bd5aa473a735aa4255cb
Message ID: <9408291623.AA29767@ah.com>
Reply To: <199408180420.VAA10365@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-29 16:44:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 09:44:36 PDT
Raw message
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 09:44:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Statistics on remail message sizes
In-Reply-To: <199408180420.VAA10365@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <9408291623.AA29767@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
A couple of weeks ago Eric asked for statistical information on
remailer message sizes. I put in a size-counter a week ago [...]
or so, and here are some results.
Based on Hal's numbers, I would suggest a reasonable quantization for
message sizes be a short set of geometrically increasing values,
namely, 1K, 4K, 16K, 64K. In retrospect, this seems like the obvious
quantization, and not arithmetic progressions. Live and learn.
Eric
Thread
Return to August 1994
- Return to “cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)”
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- 1994-08-18 (Wed, 17 Aug 94 21:21:16 PDT) - Statistics on remail message sizes - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 09:44:36 PDT) - Statistics on remail message sizes - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 12:48:21 PDT) - Re: Statistics on remail message sizes - cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 09:44:36 PDT) - Statistics on remail message sizes - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)