1994-09-28 - Anyone seen the ‘quantum cryptanalysis’ thread on sci.crypt?

Header Data

From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 51b794ed6a7c91455dd4d293d6271c69034333591fdc3e0b1dbb574e80e3465a
Message ID: <9409280734.AA12090@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-28 07:34:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 00:34:31 PDT

Raw message

From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 00:34:31 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Anyone seen the 'quantum cryptanalysis' thread on sci.crypt?
Message-ID: <9409280734.AA12090@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hi all,

Sorry if this has already been brought up (I've been skimming through c'punx
lately and may have missed it) but does anyone have any comment on this
thread (see title).

I first read about this in New Scientist (Sept 24th, No 1944). To summarize:
Shor came up with an algorithm that could use quantum effects to rapidly
factorise large primes. To build such a quantum computer requires manufacturing
techniques not yet available, although two other researchers (one is called
Eckart) streamlined Shor's algorithm and proposed a design for a "factorization
engine" using quantum dot technology. You'd need to put a lot more quantum
dots on a chip than is currently possible to build such a device, but the
suggestion could be possible in a few years time. the article hinted that
Hitachi were already hard at work on the problem.

Detractors of the proposed technique say problems of noise and sensitivity
to mechanical defects are insurmountable and the technique could never work.

I was wondering if anyone here has any comment. After reading the New Scientist
article I immediately checked it out in sci.crypt and saw a few articles there
(but they weren't on the whole any more enlightening that the New Scientist
article). 

I was wondering if anyone here had any views (informed or otherwise :-)

I suppose cypherpunks should keep up with the latest developments (or even
possibilities), and where there's quantum cryptanalysis presumably there's 
also quantum cryptography :-)

Sherry

ps if anyone is interested I'll try and dig out the references.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAgUBLokdq+Fu4n6w1qeBAQEnQgP+Mcu2NV89WuaZ9gJu5tluDzDDj0eZTj41
fWl/Opdw7mY+EqE+RZyWCHKXCx5ibgupZiAoliOfH9VoACd3aoAFJWb+4sMbPwKS
ycb6IhKHKhQQA7Q/wnVUGBb4G4B1ozC/2spCmLM83Nv2mcIzXfo5OlPU6ppg4oRU
pIfJzpcB7hM=
=iG+g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread