1994-09-09 - Re: Title VII v. Liberty

Header Data

From: cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 86614fab19b6a4a6fb5aa7ed24c85baa318d20b7183f4aefee7dfe3f4cea25fb
Message ID: <34qovq$iv@bb.com>
Reply To: <9409092040.AA00273@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-09 22:49:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 15:49:37 PDT

Raw message

From: cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 15:49:37 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Title VII v. Liberty
In-Reply-To: <9409092040.AA00273@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <34qovq$iv@bb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <9409092040.AA00273@snark.imsi.com>,
Perry E. Metzger <perry@imsi.com> wrote:
>Actually, as I recall these have mostly been marketing studies. For
>whatever reason (perhaps the same "oppressed group syndrome" that
>tends to make several other minorities work harder) gay men tend to be
>higher up on the income scale. No, I can't find a reference in a
>second -- but if you insist I'll dig one up. Those knowing my opinions
>closely enough will know that I loathe fundamentalist christians and
>that I'm quite rabbid in attacking discrimination against homosexuals.

My understanding is that it's a bimodal distribution: the marketing
studies have shown the higher modality because that's the segment that
they're interested in.
-- 
L. Todd Masco  | "Hide, witch, hide!  The good folk come to burn thee, their
cactus@bb.com  |  keen enjoyment hid behind a gothic mask of duty." -JS/BATE





Thread