1994-09-15 - Re: RC4 compatibility testing

Header Data

From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: b6ce43c3e55f6885cdf62d938dcb94a1a328ef8f9b794ad4ffa3701d02305868
Message ID: <199409150024.TAA15131@zoom.bga.com>
Reply To: <9409142059.AA03709@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-15 00:25:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 17:25:17 PDT

Raw message

From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 17:25:17 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: RC4 compatibility testing
In-Reply-To: <9409142059.AA03709@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <199409150024.TAA15131@zoom.bga.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> > And then latter if it was patented I would be exempt from paying
> > royalties on my product, no?
> 
> Ahem.
> 
> If an invention is successfully patented, any use you make of it
> requires royalties even if that use began before the patent was
> granted.
> 
> However, RC4 is probably not patentable at this point -- unless Bidzos
> has a "submarine patent" in process, which I wouldn't put past him.
> 
If there was considerable use prior to the patent application then there 
would be a good case to be made that it was in the public domain because
of this use.






Thread