1994-09-14 - Re: RC4 compatibility testing

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Message Hash: bc0ded9d25f5b17a84a232c16147f6a43490912f9d820835ec1533f3ed0b8165
Message ID: <9409142059.AA03709@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199409142050.OAA16568@misc.glarp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-14 21:00:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 14:00:16 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 14:00:16 PDT
To: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Subject: Re: RC4 compatibility testing
In-Reply-To: <199409142050.OAA16568@misc.glarp.com>
Message-ID: <9409142059.AA03709@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Brad Huntting says:
> Since RC4 is not patented, I could make a product out of this code.

Yes.

> And then latter if it was patented I would be exempt from paying
> royalties on my product, no?

Ahem.

If an invention is successfully patented, any use you make of it
requires royalties even if that use began before the patent was
granted.

However, RC4 is probably not patentable at this point -- unless Bidzos
has a "submarine patent" in process, which I wouldn't put past him.

Perry





Thread