1994-10-04 - No Subject

Header Data

From: nobody@jpunix.com (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 202353f1a6e0df7a642b58d48a04a2960c87b83eb36e5ed4c33c5ff18953041a
Message ID: <199410042048.PAA05070@jpunix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-04 20:51:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Oct 94 13:51:32 PDT

Raw message

From: nobody@jpunix.com (Anonymous)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 94 13:51:32 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199410042048.PAA05070@jpunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> That being said let it be known that I consider the following as a
> "Cypherpunk victory."
>
> 1.  Complete freedom of technology, particularly encryption technology,
	       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> regulated only by market forces.  This implies the lack of import/export
> restrictions, and a complete absence of projects designed to limit
			       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> technology, or to standardize it for nefarious ends like Clipper.
  ^^^^^^^^^^

I think you overgeneralize.  No limits on toxic waste incinerators, low-mileage automobiles, unsafe medical devices, genetically tampered food, or nuclear reactors?  "Market forces" in such cases positively encourage dangerous technology (e.g. incinerators are superficially cheap) or are marked by their inability to distinguish the good from the crap (e.g. medical devices).

We agree about crypto, but not all tech is crypto.  :)


=======================================================================
     Crim Tideson                     Privacy is its own justification.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAwUBLpCIPqvOblMnt4MdAQEgRgP/XNNQ/T/RvLnd7Rhu8OxCNlXhez8Dqt0h
mJfJ172h8QZr0TSr9jxOt6720Z5+lKGZJbP62I5OZEeufifwTXn1Q9Il1Sq4BEWA
mUFbs1mu/v88xVReuNXie5e09R7cRa4cZ8W0aGQ2+ceCBTEvJ/z8Cqps93ZucL9j
ZDtO93NM78k=
=FcUP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread