1994-11-22 - Re: A Chance Encounter with Brad Templeton, of ClariNet

Header Data

From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
To: jamesh@netcom.com (James Hightower)
Message Hash: a2502821308c7ee29aea82d0b46cb92fff26e925fe10e4ab3c6d6cdc285bc072
Message ID: <199411221852.MAA23899@pentagon.io.com>
Reply To: <199411221805.KAA13533@netcom18.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-22 18:53:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 10:53:06 PST

Raw message

From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 94 10:53:06 PST
To: jamesh@netcom.com (James Hightower)
Subject: Re: A Chance Encounter with Brad Templeton, of ClariNet
In-Reply-To: <199411221805.KAA13533@netcom18.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199411221852.MAA23899@pentagon.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jamesh@netcom.com writes:
[re: copyright stuff and remailers...]
> I vaguely remember something like this controversy occurring when
> the Xerox machine was new. Can anyone refresh my memory?

It is the same thing that happened with VCR machines (which actually went
to court, Universal Pictures v. Sony) and recently with DAT systems.  It is
probably worth noting that reality _lost_ that last battle on this issue...

jim




Thread