1994-12-13 - Re: BofA+Netscape

Header Data

From: marca@neon.mcom.com (Marc Andreessen)
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: 157b7e2b7f8e10ec15666aed30bde8ca03e55ca88fbda21a2cc883b87527ef81
Message ID: <ab1280af02021004aed6@[198.93.92.112]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-13 03:01:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 19:01:50 PST

Raw message

From: marca@neon.mcom.com (Marc Andreessen)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 19:01:50 PST
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: BofA+Netscape
Message-ID: <ab1280af02021004aed6@[198.93.92.112]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 7:50 AM 12/12/94, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>Marc Andreessen says:
>> I fully expect we'll be supporting other security standards and
>> approaches as they emerge, and we certainly welcome realistic suggestions 
>> on what we should do, when, and how.
>
>I told you in Email, Mr. Andreessen, that new transport level security
>protocols are useless now that IPSP has come near to standardization
>and now that prototype implementations are nearly available.

Great, IPSP looks fantastic and we look forward to supporting it
as it moves through and beyond the "near" phase.

> Many
>people at IETF in other groups expressed far less interest in
>proceeding with new security protocols now that there will be a
>network layer security protocol. However, you did not appear to be
>remotely interested. I suppose that you considered the comment I made
>"unrealistic".

No, I think IPSP is a great idea and I don't thin there's any question we'll
be supporting it.

>unfortunately, the product is
>just too pretty looking.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Marc


--
Marc Andreessen
Netscape Communications Corporation
Mountain View, CA
marca@mcom.com







Thread