From: werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 15:47:31 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting?
In-Reply-To: <199412112031.MAA21646@netcom12.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <JFuwkOwscsY5075yn@io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199412112031.MAA21646@netcom12.netcom.com>,
mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos) wrote:
> > Now all the lame press (and some even LAMER USENET readers) are screaming
> > foul. I bet there will be renewed interest in the cypherpunk remailer's in
> > the next few days :>
>
>I suppose this means we need strong laws against "message laundering."  

Hey, don't kid yourself! I have read comments to the extent that anon remailers
like the cypherpunks system should be BANNED! Seriously....another good reason
for putting more in Europe if possible.

Here's an idea. Someone mentioned trying to set up an anon remailer on the
North American Freenets, but it seemed there were software compatibility
problems.

Well, if we could solve the problem, assuming the Freenets in Europe use the
same software, we could set a few up in Europe ourselves from this side of the
pond. You could telnet into a Euro-Freenet (although some like Helsinki had
restrictions on members being citizens of the country) establish an account
and then e-mail the software to your account overseas.

Would this be practical? Sounds like it would be worth a shot. But again, I
guess it comes down to the software compatibility problem.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBLuuFcHBFBj7pSNyhAQF61gf/ZyrleHTVK61ruT7SvT+3BOHTYNo1eZHa
FMnEoMDGm99f0Ckr8pFwAMQcBSMEeskdg2OKjluVG8KG5y4zvejueGqElETiAkbB
XkOK+v1iAe8WFFyy3Fu0lYR/jfEcghOf1WmaJ7IRn/XTPgSlS0k21iXBC1tHSEhZ
guQRXLZC3XW8DPXBC61F2fzID/ogvXE9ATvyxEem88BOnAyUwXNsk649biGFrczh
grwGT3BUxYMk3zYTYusnC9XxUZ3JjtbiLVpZ+9e8GKNTtyR3qqxJhloZBBOxDlyx
kUH1lhNeI8qWHsaZQui1FrsG+O15ZHV7/d8Rk7teXLMFBafgJRpEHQ==
=0VL9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----