Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com> (51 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Cypherpunks & math

• 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 08:29:22 PDT) - Cypherpunks & math - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 11:30:14 PDT) - Re: Cypherpunks & math - Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
  • 1994-07-20 (Wed, 20 Jul 94 16:26:26 PDT) - Re: Cypherpunks & math - Peter Murphy <pkm@maths.uq.oz.au>

Wiretap Emergency

• 1994-09-16 (Thu, 15 Sep 94 19:05:58 PDT) - Wiretap Emergency - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting?

• 1994-12-11 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 09:13:37 PST) - Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
  • 1994-12-11 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 12:32:45 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
    • 1994-12-11 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 15:47:31 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
    • 1994-12-19 (Sun, 18 Dec 94 18:26:15 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - skaplin@skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
    • 1994-12-19 (Sun, 18 Dec 94 20:57:10 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
  • 1994-12-11 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 12:37:27 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1994-12-11 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 15:39:06 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
      • 1994-12-12 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 16:15:34 PST) - Re: Storm Brewing Over Forged Bob Rae Posting? - jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
      • 1994-12-12 (Sun, 11 Dec 94 18:49:33 PST) - Our Storm Brewing? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

JP vs Homer

• 1995-01-19 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 19:13:01 PST) - JP vs Homer - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Which remailer does Julf operate?

• 1995-01-20 (Thu, 19 Jan 95 18:06:00 PST) - Which remailer does Julf operate? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-01-20 (Thu, 19 Jan 95 22:21:55 PST) - Julf operates anon.penet.fi - “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>

Spam Busters!

• 1995-01-20 (Fri, 20 Jan 95 15:34:06 PST) - Spam Busters! - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Supreme Court on Anonymous Bills

• 1995-01-21 (Sat, 21 Jan 95 10:17:49 PST) - Supreme Court on Anonymous Bills - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-01-21 (Sat, 21 Jan 95 10:47:17 PST) - Re: Supreme Court on Anonymous Bills - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

US News and World Report

• 1995-01-24 (Mon, 23 Jan 95 16:23:48 PST) - US News and World Report - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-01-24 (Mon, 23 Jan 95 18:31:26 PST) - Re: US News and World Report - slowdog <slowdog@chewy.wookie.net>
    • 1995-01-24 (Mon, 23 Jan 95 22:23:44 PST) - Doublespeak, Doublethink, Thought Police, and 1984 - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1995-01-26 (Wed, 25 Jan 95 16:10:31 PST) - Re: Doublespeak, Doublethink, Thought Police, and 1984 - chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)

US News and World Report [Repost]

• 1995-01-26 (Wed, 25 Jan 95 17:31:04 PST) - US News and World Report [Repost] - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Secure (!?) Remailer Net

• 1995-01-28 (Sat, 28 Jan 95 05:25:18 PST) - Secure (!?) Remailer Net - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

• 1995-01-28 (Sat, 28 Jan 95 14:53:34 PST) - Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-01-29 (Sat, 28 Jan 95 21:48:02 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>

Re: Secure (?) Remailer-net

• 1995-01-29 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 06:46:52 PST) - Re: Secure (?) Remailer-net - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Always after me lucky primes…

• 1995-01-29 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 06:49:56 PST) - Always after me lucky primes… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

• 1995-01-29 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 13:04:12 PST) - Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Lucky primes & omlets on my face…

• 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:58:23 PST) - Lucky primes & omlets on my face… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

• 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:59:39 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 06:45:22 PST) - Remailer encryption module - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 06:53:24 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:48:23 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:53:15 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 07:08:49 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - Allan Bailey <allan@elvis.tamu.edu>
      • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 15:44:26 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 17:23:58 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
      • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:52:36 PST) - Re: Remailer encryption module - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:36:40 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Ending the Crusade

• 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:00:02 PST) - Ending the Crusade - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 18:21:10 PST) - Re: Ending the Crusade - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Thanks for not flaming !??!?

• 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:00:35 PST) - Thanks for not flaming !??!? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

• 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:01:19 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:16:12 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)

Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal

• 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:03:03 PST) - Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal

• 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:30:23 PST) - Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Cooperation

• 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:31:24 PST) - Cooperation - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:55:41 PST) - Re: Cooperation - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:14:00 PST) - Re: Cooperation - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>

Crusade’s End

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:10 PST) - Crusade’s End - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:10 PST) - Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

re: Remailer Encryption Module

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:19 PST) - re: Remailer Encryption Module - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

IQ & such

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:20 PST) - IQ & such - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Lucky primes–third time’s the charm?

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:49 PST) - Lucky primes–third time’s the charm? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:41:47 PST) - Re: Lucky primes–third time’s the charm? - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:05:18 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet]

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:09:32 PST) - Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet] - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Mixmaster + T1

• 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:11:02 PST) - Mixmaster + T1 - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering)

• 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 11:07:33 PDT) - Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 12:10:27 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
    • 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 12:25:11 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 14:57:46 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
        • 1995-07-25 (Mon, 24 Jul 95 21:18:22 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 15:42:14 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
  • 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 15:15:12 PDT) - Re: Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
    • 1995-07-14 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 17:01:03 PDT) - Crisis Overload (re Electronic Racketeering) - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>

U.S. Banks are not all that bad

• 1995-07-31 (Sun, 30 Jul 95 20:57:03 PDT) - U.S. Banks are not all that bad - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 20:44:59 PDT) - Re: U.S. Banks are not all that bad - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: a hole in PGP

• 1995-07-31 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 16:23:22 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
  • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 17:14:30 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 18:05:10 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
      • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 18:26:47 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 19:31:45 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
          • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 19:56:43 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
            • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 20:33:43 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
            • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 22:51:57 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
            • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 23:59:00 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP? NOT! - Derek Atkins <warlord@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
              • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 02:01:03 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP? NOT! - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu (L. McCarthy)
              • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 04:54:41 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP? NOT! - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 02:17:47 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
        • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 02:32:52 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “J. R. Valverde (EMBL Outstation: the EBI)” <txomsy@ebi.ac.uk>
    • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 19:18:07 PDT) - a hole in PGP - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
      • 1995-08-01 (Mon, 31 Jul 95 21:33:51 PDT) - Re: OS noise [Was: a hole in PGP] - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
        • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 05:19:20 PDT) - OS noise [Was: a hole in PGP] - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 03:18:50 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
      • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 10:52:32 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@khijol.intele.net>
      • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 23:09:46 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP{n@3 - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
        • 1995-08-03 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 17:34:58 PDT) - a hole in PGP{n@3 - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 07:26:19 PDT) - Re: a hole in PGP - Dave Otto <dave@dvorak.jta.edd.ca.gov>

Software Glitch FYI (fwd)

• 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 21:54:25 PDT) - Software Glitch FYI (fwd) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Provably Correct Crypto?

• 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 11:23:03 PDT) - Provably Correct Crypto? - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 12:19:05 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 14:53:28 PDT) - Provably Correct Crypto? - Phil Fraering <pgf@tyrell.net>
      • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:13:40 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 15:59:57 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Matthew James Sheppard <Matthew.Sheppard@Comp.VUW.AC.NZ>
      • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 16:24:08 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
    • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 22:44:30 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 01:36:55 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
  • 1995-08-01 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 12:25:27 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 00:59:27 PDT) - Re: Provably Correct Crypto? - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Pat Robertson Fears E-cash?

• 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 17:31:39 PDT) - Pat Robertson Fears E-cash? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:08:57 PDT) - Re: Pat Robertson Fears E-cash? - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
    • 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 22:46:16 PDT) - Re: Pat Robertson Fears E-cash? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 20:23:53 PDT) - Re: Pat Robertson Fears E-cash? - Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
        • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 21:29:57 PDT) - Re: Pat Robertson Fears E-cash? - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: There’s a hole in your crypto…

• 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 05:52:06 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - ab411@detroit.freenet.org (David R. Conrad)
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 06:39:52 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 10:10:16 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Loofbourrow <loofbour@cis.ohio-state.edu>
    • 1995-08-05 (Fri, 4 Aug 95 21:03:25 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-05 (Sat, 5 Aug 95 05:24:27 PDT) - There’s a hole in your reasonoing - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 02:18:29 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 05:54:43 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
        • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 22:12:59 PDT) - Re: There’s a hole in your crypto… - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

NYET–attempted formal specs (again)

• 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 06:53:05 PDT) - NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 11:53:49 PDT) - NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - pjm@ionia.engr.sgi.com (Patrick May)
    • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 16:43:14 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 02:06:05 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 11:33:59 PDT) - Re: NYET–attempted formal specs (again) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: LD was Re: [NOISE] was Re: a hole in PGP

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 16:29:21 PDT) - Re: LD was Re: [NOISE] was Re: a hole in PGP - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-08-02 (Wed, 2 Aug 95 16:36:18 PDT) - Re: LD was Re: [NOISE] was Re: a hole in PGP - Kragen J Sittler <xentrac@unm.edu>

RSA has been proved correct

• 1995-08-04 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 23:40:51 PDT) - RSA has been proved correct - tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-05 (Sat, 5 Aug 95 01:06:54 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - solman@MIT.EDU
    • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 18:51:07 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
      • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 20:29:50 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
        • 1995-08-07 (Sun, 6 Aug 95 22:50:13 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 10:41:53 PDT) - Re: RSA has been proved correct - sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)

Quibbling about definitions of “proof”

• 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 00:14:58 PDT) - Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 08:23:12 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 09:04:17 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - fc@all.net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
      • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 14:24:45 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - hallam@w3.org
    • 1995-08-08 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 22:49:11 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
  • 1995-08-07 (Mon, 7 Aug 95 09:53:38 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about definitions of “proof” - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>

Prime Number Gen’s.

• 1995-08-08 (Tue, 8 Aug 95 10:12:08 PDT) - Prime Number Gen’s. - aba@dcs.exeter.ac.uk
  • 1995-08-09 (Tue, 8 Aug 95 21:40:35 PDT) - Re: Prime Number Gen’s. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-08-09 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 07:14:32 PDT) - Re: Prime Number Gen’s. - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
      • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 22:01:42 PDT) - Re: Prime Number Gen’s. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) (fwd)

• 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 19:15:22 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) (fwd) - gt7508b@prism.gatech.edu (PHrEaK!)
  • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 19:37:30 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) (fwd) - jcaldwel@iquest.net (James Caldwell)
    • 1995-08-10 (Wed, 9 Aug 95 21:57:03 PDT) - Re: Classification levels (was: Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) (fwd)) - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF]

• 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 09:38:49 PDT) - Re: MD5 weakness ? [was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF] - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>