From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 44426dd850820a1c9521b262749a5d61d98bc75e1a955fc17c5b1dfb48137e82
Message ID: <199501041514.AA02778@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-04 15:14:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 07:14:10 PST
From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 07:14:10 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Regulatory Risks
Message-ID: <199501041514.AA02778@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
So if the feds intend to regulate cyberspace, what specific sorts of
regulations are possible at this point?
Forget laws, what is *technically* and institutionally feasible?
Can they just throw out TCP/IP and mandate X25? Can TCP/IP be "tamed?" How
can they control private virtual networks that piggyback on the basic
network structure?
Just questions. No answers.
DCF
*************************************************************************
ATMs, Contracting Out, Digital Switching, Downsizing, EDI, Fax, Fedex,
Home Workers, Internet, Just In Time, Leasing, Mail Receiving, Phone
Cards, Quants, Securitization, Temping, Voice Mail.
Return to January 1995
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”