1995-01-04 - Regulatory Risks

Header Data

From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 44426dd850820a1c9521b262749a5d61d98bc75e1a955fc17c5b1dfb48137e82
Message ID: <199501041514.AA02778@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-04 15:14:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 07:14:10 PST

Raw message

From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 07:14:10 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Regulatory Risks
Message-ID: <199501041514.AA02778@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


So if the feds intend to regulate cyberspace, what specific sorts of
regulations are possible at this point?

Forget laws, what is *technically* and institutionally feasible?

Can they just throw out TCP/IP and mandate X25?  Can TCP/IP be "tamed?"  How
can they control private virtual networks that piggyback on the basic
network structure?  

Just questions.  No answers.

DCF
*************************************************************************
ATMs, Contracting Out,  Digital Switching, Downsizing, EDI, Fax, Fedex,
Home Workers, Internet, Just In Time, Leasing, Mail Receiving, Phone 
Cards, Quants, Securitization, Temping, Voice Mail.






Thread