1995-01-18 - Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
Header Data
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: “Paul J. Ste. Marie” <pstemari@erinet.com>
Message Hash: 8768533d96c76af6b8b33ebc88976d7d6957d8466603ebad44009b9abbac6080
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950117165334.18688B-100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <9501172355.AA12246@eri.erinet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-18 00:57:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:57:01 PST
Raw message
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:57:01 PST
To: "Paul J. Ste. Marie" <pstemari@erinet.com>
Subject: Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
In-Reply-To: <9501172355.AA12246@eri.erinet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950117165334.18688B-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
> ...
> Which is exactly why the encrypt on receipt or decrypt on delivery ideas
> won't work. You have to be provably ignorant of the data.
In my law school they taught that the burden of proof in a
criminal case was on the government.
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread
Return to January 1995
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
- Return to “pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1995-01-18 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:04:13 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
- 1995-01-18 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:57:01 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1995-01-20 (Thu, 19 Jan 95 16:56:32 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>