1995-01-18 - Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
Header Data
From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cfa70d17a7d2e941d25b79ac6862f82f93ca21416b67ca2e8b0abb6c25583449
Message ID: <9501172355.AA12246@eri.erinet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-18 00:04:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:04:13 PST
Raw message
From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:04:13 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
Message-ID: <9501172355.AA12246@eri.erinet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:28 PM 1/17/95 -0800, Eric Hughes wrote:
> ... Meaning is subjective. If I see encrypted text, am I to be held
>responsible for having seen through an encryption for which I hold not
>the key? Merely because someone knows a transformation into a
>disapproved form does not mean that I do. ...
Which is exactly why the encrypt on receipt or decrypt on delivery ideas
won't work. You have to be provably ignorant of the data.
--Paul J. Ste. Marie
pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com
Thread
Return to January 1995
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
- Return to “pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1995-01-18 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:04:13 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
- 1995-01-18 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 16:57:01 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1995-01-20 (Thu, 19 Jan 95 16:56:32 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>