1995-01-24 - Re: The Remailer Crisis

Header Data

From: ghio@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dceeef671d7597c03a0ecca87ba27a47dcbf3d806d30ad44d309ab9f38f6dede
Message ID: <199501242057.MAA06586@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <9501232220.AA18684@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-24 20:59:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:59:59 PST

Raw message

From: ghio@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:59:59 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Remailer Crisis
In-Reply-To: <9501232220.AA18684@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <199501242057.MAA06586@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199501240400.UAA20706@largo.remailer.net> you write:
>   From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
>
>   Tim writes:
>   > One thing I should've noted is that a Linux-based cheap remailer is
>   > mostly useless without a "live connection" to the Net. 
>
>   I disagree - live connections  are great for fast-response systems,
>   but we got along just fine in the uucp dialup world with occasional
>   connections; 
>
>And if get someone to do secondary MX for you that _is_ fulltime
>connected, then the only latency for mail is the poll time.

I offer to MX, store and forward mail for anyone who wants to run
a remailer.





Thread