1995-02-06 - Re: dna ink

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 1925c8dfdeeb47dedf7bddb826b894f654aeffd414b8d0ae3f1f69397db69e84
Message ID: <9502062129.AA05503@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <v0151010eab5c172d0d6e@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-06 21:31:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:31:30 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:31:30 PST
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: dna ink
In-Reply-To: <v0151010eab5c172d0d6e@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <9502062129.AA05503@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Lucky Green says:
> At 10:30 PM 2/5/95, Dan Harmon wrote:
> >I just saw an item on CNN about a company in LA called Art Guard.  It
> >sells an ink that is created using your dna as a protection against
> >forged signatures.
> 
> Why not just sign in blood?

The same occured to me.

Perry

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
• Return to “root <root@einstein.ssz.com>”

• Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”

• 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:48:48 PST) - Re: dna ink - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:31:30 PST) - Re: dna ink - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:27:53 PST) - Re: dna ink - root <root@einstein.ssz.com>