1995-02-06 - Re: dna ink

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
Message Hash: b7e4028fb93f01b355ab4a1507828125562a136b2585823c91194f683208cc99
Message ID: <v0151010eab5c172d0d6e@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-06 20:48:48 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:48:48 PST

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:48:48 PST
To: Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
Subject: Re: dna ink
Message-ID: <v0151010eab5c172d0d6e@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:30 PM 2/5/95, Dan Harmon wrote:
>I just saw an item on CNN about a company in LA called Art Guard.  It
>sells an ink that is created using your dna as a protection against
>forged signatures.

Why not just sign in blood?


-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
• Return to “root <root@einstein.ssz.com>”

• Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”

• 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:48:48 PST) - Re: dna ink - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:31:30 PST) - Re: dna ink - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:27:53 PST) - Re: dna ink - root <root@einstein.ssz.com>