1995-02-10 - Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)

Header Data

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Message Hash: 5b027b1452d55461b488d172d38b1d130ebb879608d919bbaf829a3b68ff6524
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950210135809.26929B-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950210010704.5527A-100000@access3.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 19:08:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:08:17 PST

Raw message

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:08:17 PST
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950210010704.5527A-100000@access3.digex.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950210135809.26929B-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:

[about HR 666]

> The bill is really just a restatement.  This has been the state of the 
> law for 11 years now.

Right - it is time to change the law.  HR 666 won't help in that direction.


-Thomas

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to “<dshayer@netcom.com> (David Shayer)”
• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
• Return to “Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>”
• Return to “Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>”
• Return to “Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>”
• Return to “Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>”

• Return to “wfgodot@iquest.com (Michael Pierson)”

• 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 21:07:18 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - <dshayer@netcom.com> (David Shayer)
  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 22:28:29 PST) - The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 04:55:05 PST) - Re: The question is moot: - wfgodot@iquest.com (Michael Pierson)
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 05:05:09 PST) - Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) - Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
      • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:23:14 PST) - Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:52:59 PST) - Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)] - Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:08:17 PST) - Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>