1995-02-10 - Re: MIME based remailing commands
Header Data
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Message Hash: 723a756abcb841491af30857cacf610e7d087184e023bd705ace68a6b65a69e9
Message ID: <199502101735.JAA18715@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199502101639.IAA21710@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 17:37:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST
Raw message
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
In-Reply-To: <199502101639.IAA21710@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199502101735.JAA18715@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> I think this might be caused by a disagreement between the To: address in
> the message itself and whatever "To" address was passed to sendmail on
> the command line. If you pass -t to sendmail then it won't look for a
> "To" address on the command line, at least as configured at my site.
>
It doesn't matter if they disagree. If you don't have a To:
line in the header then "Apparently-To:" gets tacked on using the "To"
from the envelope.
--
sameer Voice: 510-841-2014
Network Administrator Pager: 510-321-1014
Community ConneXion: The NEXUS-Berkeley Dialin: 510-549-1383
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Thread
Return to February 1995
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)”
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
- 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 22:57:19 PST) - Re: MIME based remailing commands - lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
- 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 08:40:21 PST) - Re: MIME based remailing commands - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST) - Re: MIME based remailing commands - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 08:40:21 PST) - Re: MIME based remailing commands - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>