cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-02-10 - Re: MIME based remailing commands

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: 9994d4d9d13d2151943f478aa2603e83dc47e12491a55024297a856d4bfa2b63
Message ID: <9502102043.AA11506@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9502082303.AA10796@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 20:46:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:46:16 PST

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:46:16 PST
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
In-Reply-To: <9502082303.AA10796@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9502102043.AA11506@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 18:03:57 -0500
    From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>

    xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu says:
    > IMHO, an ideal message would have the ability to handle nested objects
    > of varying types, MIME is only a start.

    What is it precisely that you might want to encapsulate that MIME
    can't encapsulate?

And in what way does MIME encapsulation aid in the privacy goals of
remailing?

It seems far more likely to require that you expose information which
you might prefer not to expose, much as the Privacy Enhanced Mail
standard does.

--
Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>      Please do not send electronic junk mail!
  Lehman Brothers Inc.
  3 World Financial Center  "The more laws and order are made prominent, the
  New York, NY  10285-1100   more thieves and robbers there will be." --Lao Tzu

Thread