cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-02-10 - Re: MIME based remailing commands

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: Eric Hughes <eric@remailer.net>
Message Hash: b384e134ac61eb8b454f2e851d893af330828499577c0e814188b6d6c9644492
Message ID: <9502102057.AA11903@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199502090425.UAA24521@largo.remailer.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 21:00:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:00:57 PST

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:00:57 PST
To: Eric Hughes <eric@remailer.net>
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
In-Reply-To: <199502090425.UAA24521@largo.remailer.net>
Message-ID: <9502102057.AA11903@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 20:25:32 -0800
    From: Eric Hughes <eric@remailer.net>
    
    You say MIME, and you've not completely specified the data format,
    but rather constrained it in a way that most everybody basically
    agrees with, including me.

Could one of the MIME supporters (I guess that would be `most
everybody') explain why anything more than a To: header and an
encrypted block is desireable for the in-the-clear message?

Specifically, why is it desireable to broadcast additional information
about a message for which privacy is a primary concern?

--
Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>      Please do not send electronic junk mail!
  Lehman Brothers Inc.
  3 World Financial Center  "The more laws and order are made prominent, the
  New York, NY  10285-1100   more thieves and robbers there will be." --Lao Tzu

Thread