From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: afb45f9ebe67dfd4c3961b06e211b895fd3d37131eff3397b58681fa417cce2a
Message ID: <199502062113.NAA20075@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <9502062043.AA05429@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-06 21:15:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:15:06 PST
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:15:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cooperation
In-Reply-To: <9502062043.AA05429@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <199502062113.NAA20075@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Eric says:
> In particular, I chose Request-Remailing-To: as a purposefully obtuse
> experimental name. It deserves to die.
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
I'd say that it would work far better if things were changed to MIME
formats. You would send a message by recursively encapsulating your
message to be remailed inside a MIME message. Simple and clean...
That's fine. I like MIME, but the issue is cleaning up the existing
remailers, none of which use MIME, and the chaining scripts, none of
which do either.
Getting everybody to support Anon-Send-To: in addition to
Request-Remailing-To: is a very simple and straightforward fix for an
acknowledged syntactic inanity.
Eric
Return to February 1995
Return to “storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)”