1995-02-07 - Re: Cooperation

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: ff97a9b2a1a4b72c51120ce0230f1ad5981f3e9bb4b312df99f7050a019bf5f6
Message ID: <9502071321.AA19736@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9502062043.AA05429@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-07 13:22:55 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 05:22:55 PST

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 05:22:55 PST
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: Cooperation
In-Reply-To: <9502062043.AA05429@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9502071321.AA19736@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Mon, 06 Feb 1995 15:43:46 -0500
    From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>

    I'd say that it would work far better if things were changed to MIME
    formats. You would send a message by recursively encapsulating your
    message to be remailed inside a MIME message. Simple and clean...

Personally, I vastly prefer that things that can be handled with
header lines be handled that way.

MIME may be general and handle messages with mixed data, but the
Big-Ugly-Block style that everything seems to be moving to is, well,
overly big and overly ugly.

When the data in a message is of a single type, adding all of this
ugly MIME bulk is neither simple nor clean.  It's artificial
complexity and needless blecherousness.

Recursive encapsulation needn't affect how any particular level looks.

			Rick





Thread